1. Introduction to the Core Emotion Framework (CEF)

 

The Core Emotion Framework (CEF), as presented by resources like optimizeyourcapabilities.com and optimizeyourcapabilities.pro, proposes a structured approach to understanding and optimizing human emotional experience. It posits that our inner world is governed by ten fundamental "core emotions" categorized across three primary centers:

 

1. Head Center (Cognitive): Associated with thinking, perception, and decision-making. Includes Sensing, Calculating, and Deciding.
2. Heart Center (Affective): Associated with connection, emotional flow, and relational dynamics. Includes Expanding, Precising, and Performing-Juggling-Success.
3. Gut Center (Active/Conative): Associated with motivation, action, and foundational drives. Includes Managing, Clapping, Boosting, and Surrendering.

 

A unique aspect of the CEF is the proposition that specific "cycling points" or internally imagined energetic movements within these centers can intentionally activate or modulate the corresponding core emotions.

 

Our aim here is to provide a theoretical argument for the plausibility of these claims, setting the stage for future empirical validation. The foundational premise for this theoretical proof rests on the widely accepted psychological principle of the mind-body connection: the reciprocal influence between our mental states (thoughts, intentions, visualizations) and our physiological/emotional states (Damasio, 1994; Porges, 2011).

 

Furthermore, many traditional wisdom traditions and modern complementary health practices posit that intentional mental engagement can influence a subtle internal "energetic" landscape, impacting overall well-being and psychological states (e.g., within concepts of Qi, Prana, or energy centers). When we direct our attention and intention in a specific way, it can induce corresponding internal shifts. The CEF offers concrete "actions" for this internal direction.

 

2. Theoretical Proof for the Head Center (Cognitive Emotions)

 

The Head Center governs cognitive and decisional processes. The CEF suggests:

 

1. Clockwise Cycle: Activates Sensing (receptive, open awareness, intuition, non-judgmental processing).
2. Counter-Clockwise Cycle: Activates Calculating (analytical thought, logical sequencing, strategic planning).
3. Swinging Motion: Activates Deciding (integration of perspectives, reducing ambivalence, clear choice).

 

Theoretical Coherence:

 

The intuitive mapping of clockwise/counter-clockwise motion to distinct cognitive styles finds conceptual alignment with aspects of brain lateralization (Sperry, 1968; Gazzaniga, 1985). While the brain's functions are highly integrated, broad distinctions have been observed:

 

1. Left Hemisphere: Traditionally associated with logical, analytical, sequential, and linguistic processing (Gazzaniga, 1985).
2. Right Hemisphere: Traditionally associated with holistic, intuitive, spatial, and perceptual processing; often linked to broader awareness and non-linear thought (Ornstein, 1997).

 

Given this conceptual framework, the following theoretical connections emerge:

 

1. Clockwise Cycle for Sensing & Holistic Thinking: An imagined clockwise movement, especially when associated with an outward or expansive feeling, could theoretically prime mental networks related to right-hemisphere dominant processing—fostering openness, intuitive reception, and a holistic, non-linear approach to information (Ornstein, 1997). This aligns with the "Sensing" emotion's qualities of receptive awareness and non-judgmental processing. This conceptualization also resonates strongly with the core principles of mindfulness meditation, which emphasizes a receptive, non-judgmental awareness of present-moment experience (Kabat-Zinn, 1990; Siegel, 2007). The "energetic" direction of expansion further supports an opening to sensory input and intuitive flow.
2. Counter-Clockwise Cycle for Calculating & Analytical Thinking: Conversely, a counter-clockwise motion might metaphorically or energetically resonate with processes of inward focus, deconstruction, and sequential analysis. This could theoretically activate left-hemisphere dominant cognitive functions, enhancing logical processing, critical evaluation, and strategic problem-solving, which are hallmarks of the "Calculating" emotion (Gazzaniga, 1985). This aligns with "convergent thinking," which focuses on finding a single, correct solution (Guilford, 1950).
3. Swinging Motion for Deciding: The "Deciding" emotion involves balancing various perspectives and moving towards a clear choice. A swinging motion, characterized by dynamic equilibrium and rhythmic oscillation between two points, intuitively represents the process of weighing options and integrating diverse inputs to achieve a resolution. This dynamic balance can be seen as a mental exercise facilitating decisiveness by harmonizing competing thoughts and feelings, drawing on principles of cognitive integration (e.g., from cognitive dissonance theory, Festinger, 1957, towards resolution).

 

While direct scientific evidence for specific mental rotation directions influencing these precise cognitive styles is nascent and often metaphorical, the conceptual framework aligns with the general understanding of specialized cognitive functions and the power of directed mental imagery to influence mental states (Kosslyn, 1994).

 

3. Theoretical Proof for the Heart Center (Affective Emotions)

 

The Heart Center governs emotional flow and connection. The CEF suggests:

 

1. Clockwise Cycle: Activates Expanding (receptivity, compassion, unconditional love).
2. Counter-Clockwise Cycle: Activates Precising (discernment, refinement, healthy boundaries).
3. Swinging Motion: Activates Performing-Juggling-Success (flow state, effortless execution, mastery).

 

Theoretical Coherence:

 

The Heart Center's emotions deal with interpersonal and intrapersonal affective states, resonating with the psychological understanding of emotional regulation and relational dynamics (Gross, 1998).

 

 

1. Clockwise Cycle for Expanding: An outward, clockwise spiraling motion from the heart region intuitively symbolizes an opening, radiating compassion, empathy, and a broadening of one's emotional field. This aligns directly with Fredrickson's Broaden-and-Build Theory of Positive Emotions (Fredrickson, 2001), which suggests that positive emotions (like interest, contentment, love) broaden an individual's momentary thought-action repertoires, leading to creative, holistic, and flexible actions. An "expanding" internal state would facilitate this broadening. This motion also mirrors the energetic expansion often cultivated in loving-kindness (metta) meditation, which aims to cultivate boundless compassion and connection (Salzberg, 1995). The outward energetic flow supports this sense of connection.
2. Counter-Clockwise Cycle for Precising: In contrast, a counter-clockwise motion can be intuitively associated with drawing inward, refining, or sharpening focus. This could theoretically prime the ability to discern subtle emotional cues, clarify one's own feelings, or define appropriate emotional boundaries. This "precising" is crucial for emotional intelligence (Salovey & Mayer, 1990), allowing for depth and clarity within connections rather than diffuse sentiment. This process is akin to emotional differentiation, distinguishing between specific emotional states (e.g., Barrett et al., 2001), and can be enhanced by mindful awareness of internal sensations. The inward energetic quality supports introspection and definition.
3. Swinging Motion for Achieving (Performing-Juggling-Success): The concept of a "flow state" (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990) describes a state of optimal experience characterized by focused attention, intrinsic enjoyment, and effortless action. A rhythmic, balanced swinging motion from the Heart Center represents the dynamic equilibrium required for "Performing-Juggling-Success." It embodies the seamless interplay of focused effort and fluid adaptation, enabling a state of mastery and effortless execution in complex tasks or interactions. The rhythmic nature could also relate to psychophysiological coherence, often linked to optimal performance (McCraty & Childre, 2010), representing an energetic balance and smooth flow that facilitates effortless action.

 

The Heart Center's cycling points offer a theoretically sound method for intentional emotional regulation, providing an internal "lever" for shifting between states of broad connection, refined discernment, and optimal performance.

 

4. Theoretical Proof for the Gut Center (Active/Conative Emotions)

 

The Gut Center governs action, motivation, and fundamental drives. The CEF suggests:

 

1. Clockwise Cycle: Activates Managing (taking charge, organizing, responsibility).

2. Counter-Clockwise Cycle: Activates Clapping (celebration, appreciation, acknowledging others).

3. Swinging Motion: Activates Boosting (empowering, encouraging, increasing potential).

4. Inward Spiraling Motion: Activates Surrendering (releasing control, accepting, letting go).

 

Theoretical Coherence:

 

The Gut Center's emotions are directly linked to our capacity for action and our relationship with control, effort, and release, aligning with principles of embodied cognition (Barsalou, 2008) and self-regulation (Baumeister & Vohs, 2004).

 

 

1. Clockwise Cycle for Managing: An outward-driving clockwise motion from the gut region intuitively symbolizes assertive action, directed energy, and organized effort. It reflects the internal process of taking charge, structuring tasks, and leading. This aligns with the "Managing" emotion, which is about establishing control and responsibility. It's an internal command to initiate and direct, consistent with a sense of agency (Bandura, 1986). The outward energetic propulsion supports proactive engagement. This principle extends to literal physical engagement; for instance, turning an actual wheel in a clockwise direction can embody and reinforce the feeling of actively 'managing' or controlling a process.

2. Counter-Clockwise Cycle for Clapping: While "clapping" is an outward expression, a counter-clockwise motion can be seen as the responsive, resonant echo of energy or a rhythmic expression of positive feedback. It's about radiating acknowledgment and shared enthusiasm. This embodies the "Clapping" emotion's focus on celebration and energizing others, acting as a dynamic expression of positive reinforcement (Skinner, 1938). The rhythmic pattern might also evoke a sense of collective energy and shared positive affect, a form of energetic resonance. Similarly, a deliberate counter-clockwise motion of a wheel or a rhythmic physical action can externalize and amplify the sense of positive feedback or group energy.

3. Swinging Motion for Boosting: A vigorous swinging motion from the gut evokes the idea of generating momentum, providing thrust, or building power. This directly aligns with "Boosting"—the act of empowering oneself or others, increasing potential, and imparting vital energy to propel action or overcome inertia. It represents dynamic support and upward drive, akin to motivational priming (Chartrand et al., 2008). This dynamic energetic movement translates into increased vitality and potential for action. Physically swinging or oscillating a mechanism can serve as a tangible embodiment of this "boosting" energy.

4. Inward Spiraling Motion for Surrendering: This motion is distinctly different from the others, signifying a drawing inward, a release of outward tension, and a descent into stillness or acceptance. It intuitively represents letting go of control, dissolving resistance, and trusting the natural unfolding of events. This aligns perfectly with "Surrendering," a state of profound acceptance and release, crucial for avoiding burnout and fostering resilience (Linehan, 1993; Germer & Siegel, 2012). This concept is central to mindfulness-based interventions, emphasizing non-striving and acceptance of present moment reality, including difficult emotions and sensations (Kabat-Zinn, 1990; Teasdale et al., 2002). The inward energetic movement supports a release of active effort and a grounding into inner peace. While less directly transferable to a "wheel" action, a physical act of gently releasing or relaxing the grip on something, or a slow inward spiral of movement, could embody this release.

 

The Gut Center's cycling points offer a theoretically compelling set of internal actions to cultivate specific motivational states, providing concrete tools for enhancing agency, fostering appreciation, empowering action, and facilitating healthy release.

 

5. Overall Theoretical Coherence

 

The theoretical plausibility of the CEF's cycling points across all three centers rests on several interconnected psychological principles:

 

1. Mind-Body Connection & Embodied Cognition: Our mental visualizations and intentions can profoundly influence our physiological and emotional states (Damasio, 1994; Barsalou, 2008). The CEF provides specific "internal actions" (the cycling motions) to leverage this connection, making abstract emotional states more accessible and modifiable through a concrete mental task. Crucially, the principles of embodied cognition suggest that physical actions, even simple ones like turning a wheel, can directly influence or reinforce cognitive and emotional states (Glenberg & Kaschak, 2002; Strack et al., 1988). This means that engaging in the actual physical motion of turning a wheel in a specified direction could amplify the intended emotional or cognitive shift, providing a powerful external anchor for the internal practice.

2. Directed Attention and Intentionality: Consciously directing attention to specific internal movements with a clear intention to evoke a particular emotion is a powerful act of self-regulation (Posner & Petersen, 1990; Mischel et al., 2011). The CEF offers a structured and systematic way to practice this.

3. Metaphorical Resonance: The chosen directions of "cycling" (clockwise, counter-clockwise, swinging, inward spiraling) hold powerful metaphorical and intuitive associations with the qualities of the emotions they are intended to evoke (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980). These metaphors may provide a cognitive framework that facilitates the desired internal shifts. The tangible experience of manipulating a physical object like a wheel can further solidify these metaphorical connections.

4. Actionable Framework: By providing distinct internal "actions" for each core emotion, the CEF moves beyond passive emotional understanding to offer an active, participatory approach to emotional optimization.

5. Tripartite Model Consistency: The division into Cognitive, Affective, and Conative centers aligns with long-standing conceptual distinctions in psychology and philosophy, suggesting a fundamental organization of human experience (Hilgard, 1980).
6. Mindfulness and Present Moment Awareness: Many cycling points, particularly Sensing, Expanding, and Surrendering, align directly with the cultivation of mindful awareness, non-judgmental acceptance, and present-moment engagement, which are cornerstones of psychological well-being (Kabat-Zinn, 1990; Siegel, 2007). The internal focus required for the cycling points inherently promotes a mindful state. When combined with physical movement, this becomes mindful movement, enhancing body awareness and promoting a deeper mind-body connection (Chou et al., 2017).
7. Internal Energetic Regulation: The concept of "energetic movements" within the body centers resonates with traditional and contemporary perspectives on subtle anatomy and internal energy systems (e.g., in yoga, Qigong, or somatic experiencing). While not directly measurable by current Western scientific instruments in a purely physical sense, the subjective experience of shifts in internal vitality, flow, and regulation through these directed movements contributes to a sense of energetic balance and well-being (Payne et al., 2005; Shusterman, 2008). The CEF provides a framework for intentionally influencing these subjective energetic states.

 

6. Limitations of Theoretical Proof

 

It's crucial to emphasize that a "theoretical proof" establishes logical coherence and intuitive plausibility, but it doesn't constitute empirical or scientific proof. The arguments presented here are based on conceptual alignment with broader psychological principles and the internal consistency of the CEF model.

 

True scientific validation would require:

 

1. Empirical Observation: Measurable effects on emotions, cognitive styles, and behaviors.
2. Reproducibility: Consistent results across different individuals and studies.
3. Mechanistic Understanding: Deeper insights into the neurological or physiological processes underlying the effects of these internal visualizations.

4. Falsifiability: The ability for the hypothesis to be disproven through empirical testing.

 

Therefore, this theoretical framework serves as a strong foundation and a compelling invitation for rigorous empirical investigation.

 

7. Call to Action: Testing the Core Emotion Framework's Cycling Points

 

To move beyond theoretical plausibility towards evidence-based understanding, we call upon both individuals and researchers to actively test the CEF's claims.

 

For Individuals (Self-Experimentation & Personal Exploration):

 

Your personal experience is a vital first step in validating these concepts.

 

How to Conduct Your Personal Test:

 

Choose a Core Emotion and its Cycling Point: Refer to the CEF model and pick one core emotion from the Head, Heart, or Gut center that you wish to explore (e.g., "Sensing" from the Head, "Expanding" from the Heart, "Managing" from the Gut, "Surrendering" from the Gut). Identify its corresponding cycling motion.

 

1. Head: Clockwise (Sensing), Counter-Clockwise (Calculating), Swinging (Deciding).
2. Heart: Clockwise (Expanding), Counter-Clockwise (Precising), Swinging (Performing-Juggling-Success).
3. Gut: Clockwise (Managing), Counter-Clockwise (Clapping), Swinging (Boosting), Inward Spiraling (Surrendering).

 

Establish a Baseline (Self-Reflection): Before you begin, take a few moments to quietly reflect on your current internal state.

 

1. Cognitive: Are you feeling analytical, scattered, receptive, decisive?
2. Emotional: Are you feeling open, guarded, connected, discerning?
3. Active/Motivational: Are you feeling in control, energetic, appreciated, resistant, at ease? Briefly journal your current feelings or rate them on a simple scale (e.g., 1-5 for intensity of a particular state).

 

Perform the Cycling Practice:

 

1. Find a quiet place where you won't be disturbed.
2. Close your eyes (optional, but can aid focus).
3. Direct your attention to the designated "center" (Head, Heart, or Gut).
4. Consciously visualize and feel the specified cycling motion (e.g., "a gentle, imagined clockwise energetic cycle within your head space").

5. Optional for Gut Center emotions (Managing, Clapping, Boosting, Surrendering): If accessible, consider performing the motion with an actual wheel or a similar physical object. For instance, actively turning a small physical wheel clockwise for "Managing," counter-clockwise for "Clapping," or swinging it for "Boosting." For "Surrendering," a gentle release of the wheel or a very slow, inward movement.

6. Maintain this focused visualization and internal sensation for 5-10 minutes.
7. Breathe naturally and allow yourself to simply observe any sensations or shifts. This practice inherently involves mindful attention to internal experience.

 

Post-Practice Reflection: Immediately after the practice, take more time to reflect and journal.

 

1. "What changes do I notice in my thoughts, feelings, or sense of being?"
2. "Did the intended emotion (e.g., Sensing, Expanding, Managing) feel more prominent?"
3. "Were there any unexpected sensations or insights, perhaps relating to a shift in internal 'energy' or 'balance'?" Re-rate your state on the same scale used for baseline.

 

Consistency and Repetition:

 

1. Practice the same cycling point daily for at least a week to observe consistency.
2. Then, experiment with different cycling points and their corresponding emotions.
3. Pay attention to how different motions (internal and external) influence different internal states and your overall sense of energetic well-being.

 

For Researchers (Empirical Study Design):

 

Rigorous scientific investigation is essential to validate the CEF. This is an invitation to contribute to the understanding of emotional and cognitive regulation.

 

Proposed Research Design Elements:

 

Formulate Specific, Testable Hypotheses:

 

1. Example (Head Center): "Participants engaging in a clockwise mental visualization within the head region will report significantly higher scores on measures of 'Sensing' (e.g., openness, intuition, non-judgmental awareness, mindful receptivity) compared to a control group or those engaging in a counter-clockwise visualization."
2. Example (Gut Center - Physical Embodiment): "Participants physically turning a wheel clockwise will report higher levels of perceived 'Managing' (e.g., sense of control, organizational ability) compared to those performing a neutral physical action or a purely internal visualization of the clockwise motion, demonstrating the amplifying effect of embodied cognition."
3. Example (Heart Center): "Participants engaging in a swinging mental visualization within the heart region will exhibit increased markers of 'flow state' (e.g., self-reported absorption, objective task performance) and self-reported energetic balance compared to a baseline condition."
4. Example (Gut Center - Mindfulness & Energetic Release): "Individuals practicing an inward spiraling motion in the gut region (internal or external) will show a reduction in physiological stress indicators (e.g., heart rate variability, cortisol levels) and increased self-reported acceptance ('Surrendering') and feelings of inner calm/energetic release in response to a challenging task, consistent with outcomes from mindfulness-based stress reduction."

 

Participants:

 

1. Recruit a diverse and sufficiently large sample size for statistical power.
2. Consider both naive participants and those familiar with visualization/meditation practices.

 

Methodology:

 

1. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs): Assign participants to different groups (e.g., internal clockwise cycling, external clockwise turning of a wheel, neutral visualization, no intervention).
2. Within-Subjects Design: Each participant performs multiple conditions in a randomized order to control for individual differences.
3. Pre- and Post-Intervention Measures: Collect data before and immediately after each cycling practice.

 

Measures:

 

• Subjective Self-Report Scales: Develop or adapt validated psychometric scales to measure the intensity of each core emotion and associated cognitive/affective/conative states (e.g., scales for openness, analytical thinking, compassion, sense of control, acceptance, mindfulness traits/states, perceived energy levels, somatic awareness).

 

Behavioral Tasks:

 

1. Cognitive: Creative problem-solving tasks (for Sensing), logical reasoning puzzles (for Calculating), decision-making simulations (for Deciding).

2. Affective: Empathy tasks, social connection assessments, task performance metrics for "flow."

3. Active/Conative: Leadership simulations, perseverance tasks, stress coping assessments (for Surrendering), or tasks where tangible physical manipulation (like turning a dial or wheel) is relevant.

 

Physiological Measures (for more objective data):

 

1. Neurological (EEG/fMRI): Explore brain activation patterns or lateralization shifts during specific cycling points, potentially linking to states of mindful awareness or cognitive processing, and how these are affected by concurrent physical action.

2. Autonomic Nervous System: Heart Rate Variability (HRV), Galvanic Skin Response (GSR), skin temperature (indicators of arousal/relaxation and physiological coherence).

3. Biomarkers: Cortisol levels (for stress/surrender).

 

Data Analysis:

 

1. Utilize appropriate statistical methods (e.g., ANOVA, t-tests, regression analysis) to analyze quantitative data.
2. Employ qualitative methods (e.g., thematic analysis) for open-ended self-report data to capture rich experiential insights, including descriptions of internal energetic sensations or shifts and the impact of physical movements.

 

Considerations:

 

1. Replication: Encourage multiple independent research teams to replicate findings to ensure robustness.
2. Longitudinal Studies: Investigate the long-term effects of consistent practice of these cycling points, both internal and external, on overall well-being, emotional regulation, and perceived energetic vitality.
3. Mechanism Exploration: Beyond demonstrating effectiveness, future research could delve into how these internal visualizations and accompanying physical actions produce their effects (e.g., psychological priming, neuroplasticity, enhanced interoception, or direct modulation of arousal states through motor-cognitive coupling).

 

By engaging in these forms of inquiry, whether personal or scientific, we can collectively advance our understanding of the Core Emotion Framework and its potential to enhance human capabilities and well-being.

 

 

References

 

1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
2. Barrett, L. F., Gross, J., Christensen, T. C., & Benvenuto, J. (2001). Knowing what you're feeling: The structure of emotional experience and the differentiation of emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 108–121.
3. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.
4. Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. Guilford Press.
5. Chartrand, T. L., Dalton, A. N., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2008). Nonconscious motivational priming. In J. Shah & W. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 370–385). Guilford Press.
6. Chou, C. S., Lee, M. H., & Yang, C. C. (2017). The effects of mindful movements on body awareness and emotional regulation among children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26(15-16), 2321-2331. (For mindful movement)
7. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper & Row.
8. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. Putnam.
9. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
10. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.
11. Gazzaniga, M. S. (1985). The Social Brain: Discovering the Networks of the Mind. Basic Books.
12. Germer, C. K., & Siegel, R. D. (2012). Mindfulness and psychotherapy (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
13. Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, D. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558-565. (For embodied cognition and action)
14. Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299.
15. Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454.
16. Hilgard, E. R. (1980). The trilogy of mind: Cognition, affection, and conation. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16(2), 107–117.
17. Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. Delta.
18. Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate. MIT Press.
19. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
20. Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. Guilford Press.
21. McCraty, R., & Childre, D. (2010). Coherence: Bridging personal, social, and global health. Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing, 6(5), 297–313.
22. Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. L. (2011). The Marshmallow Test: Mastering Self-Control. Little, Brown and Company.
23. Ornstein, R. E. (1997). The right mind: Making sense of the hemispheres. Harcourt Brace.
24. Payne, P., Levine, P. A., & Crane-Godreau, M. A. (2005). Somatic experiencing: Using interoception and proprioception as core elements of trauma treatment. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 9(4), 223–233.
25. Porges, S. W. (2011). The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self-regulation. W. W. Norton & Company.
26. Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13(1), 25–42.
27. Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185–211.
28. Salzberg, S. (1995). Lovingkindness: The revolutionary art of happiness. Shambhala Publications.
29. Siegel, D. J. (2007). The mindful brain: Reflection and attunement in the cultivation of well-being. W. W. Norton & Company.
30. Shusterman, R. (2008). Body consciousness: A philosophy of mindfulness and somaesthetics. Cambridge University Press.
31. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
32. Sperry, R. W. (1968). Hemisphere deconnection and unity in conscious awareness. American Psychologist, 23(10), 723–733.
33. Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Stepper, S. (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 768–777. (For embodied effects of physical action)
34. Teasdale, J. D., Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., Ridgeway, V. A., Soulsby, J. M., & Lau, M. A. (2002). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: Replication and exploration of differential relapse prevention effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70(5), 1157–1164.