People often need a boost to complete tasks—especially in workplace settings. But external boosting can feel intrusive, performative, or even counterproductive. Instead, a banner that quietly depicts all ten core emotions of the Core Emotion Framework (CEF) could offer a more elegant solution: a visual anchor that energizes and rebalances without demanding attention. Such a banner wouldn’t just decorate a space—it would recalibrate it. By representing each core emotion with symbolic imagery and somatic cues, the banner becomes a gentle invitation to emotional presence. It offers the shared core emotional concepts that fosters clarity, connection, and self-regulation—without the noise of external motivation.
The article focuses on the Core Emotion Framework (CEF), a model designed to operationalize emotional intelligence (EI). Key concepts include its ten mental operations and its grounding in the theory of constructed emotion, dimensional models of emotion (valence and arousal), and the concept of interoception. The report establishes parallels between the CEF's operations and established therapeutic practices like Somatic Experiencing (SE), Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), and the RAIN method of mindfulness. It also discusses the strategic value of the Public Banner Initiative as an application of nudge theory and visual communication to enhance workplace well-being, improve productivity, and provide a measurable Return on Investment (ROI).
This report provides a comprehensive, expert-level analysis of the Core Emotion Framework (CEF) and its associated Public Banner Initiative, grounding its claims in robust academic and professional literature. The objective is to professionally support and extend the framework by identifying its foundational principles, establishing its unique position relative to established models, and demonstrating the strategic value of its public-facing initiatives.
The analysis reveals four key findings:
By organizing emotional architecture into three centers—Head, Heart, and Gut—and mapping ten core emotional processes across them, the CEF enables individuals and communities to:
Sense, calculate , and decide with cognitive clarity
Expand, constrict, and achieve with relational fluency
Arrange, appreciate, and boost with embodied drive
Accept and manifest with integrative wisdom
This structural clarity makes the CEF uniquely suited for ritual design, emotional regulation, and scalable implementation across educational, therapeutic, and organizational domains. It doesn’t just describe emotional intelligence—it operationalizes it.
In conclusion, the Core Emotion Framework and its Public Banner Initiative are poised to deliver a dual benefit: empowering individuals with a scientifically grounded, actionable process for emotional development while providing organizations with a strategic, evidence-based tool that enhances well-being and yields a measurable business return.
Disclaimer: While the Core Emotion Framework (CEF) is grounded in scientific principles and supported by overlapping research validating its constituent elements, it has not yet been studied as a unified model due to limited funding. This gap reflects resource constraints rather than a lack of empirical promise.
The Core Emotion Framework is not a departure from emotional science but a sophisticated application of its most modern and nuanced theories. The framework’s conceptual underpinnings are rooted in the shift away from "basic emotion theory," which posits that emotions are innate and universally identifiable, towards a more dynamic and process-oriented view. This section establishes the theoretical foundation upon which the CEF is built.
A central tenet of modern emotion science is the "theory of constructed emotion," which hypothesizes that emotions such as "anger," "sadness," and "fear" are not basic building blocks in the mind, but are instead "mental events that result from the dynamic interplay of more basic brain networks that are not themselves specific to emotion"1. This theory, championed by researchers like Lisa Feldman Barrett, posits that emotions are actively constructed in the moment from a variety of "psychological ingredients," including interoception, vision, hearing, touch, and a conceptual system1. This perspective validates the CEF's focus on ten distinct "mental operations," positioning them as the very processes by which individuals can actively participate in and influence the construction of their emotional experiences.
A critical component of this construction is interoception, which is defined as the brain's awareness of the body's internal sensations2. Research on interoceptive mechanisms and emotional processing highlights that a lack of interoceptive awareness is linked to emotion disorders such as depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and substance use disorder (SUD)3. This connection underscores the fundamental importance of the CEF's operations that focus on internal awareness. By directing attention to the body as the initial step in emotional processing, the framework provides a critical pathway to emotional health that is supported by a large body of clinical research.
To move beyond the limitations of discrete emotion labels, the CEF aligns with dimensional models of emotion, which represent all emotional experiences as an uninterrupted spectrum4. These models, such as the circumplex and vector models, characterize core affect based on two fundamental dimensions: valence and arousal5. Valence describes the pleasantness of an emotion, ranging from positive to negative, while arousal measures its intensity, from high to low4. This scientific lexicon provides a more nuanced and accurate way to describe internal states, moving beyond simplistic labels to a rich understanding of intensity and pleasantness.
This view is incorporated in CEF's system, while valence is controled be the Deciding and Arranging Core Emotions and arousal by Sensing+Boosting versus Accepting+Calculating.
The CEF can be extended further by incorporating a third, less-common dimension found in academic literature: "Time Perspective"4. This dimension varies from "future-related to past-related" and provides a crucial cognitive context to the valence-arousal map. While most dimensional models focus on the what and how intense of a feeling, the addition of a temporal dimension allows the CEF to address emotions rooted in past events (e.g., sadness, regret) or those oriented toward future anxieties (e.g., anticipation, fear)4. This reframes emotions not just as internal states but as states with a temporal context, adding a layer of depth to the framework's operational process.
This point was not much elaborated by the CEF but it is still included there. The Core Emotion of Arranging (-which might or might not be combined with Constricting, depending if precision is also needed) performs all kinds of measurement, which includes assessing levels of importance, safety measures as well as time management. The ability to effectively manage one's time and environment is also a key component of self-regulation, which is essential for achieving goals and improving overall well-being7. Research shows that creating order in one's environment, whether physical or digital, can reduce stress and improve mental clarity by reducing visual and mental clutter, which in turn frees up cognitive resources for other tasks8.
The human emotional landscape is not limited to singular feelings. Research indicates that "mixed emotional experiences," defined as experiencing more than one emotion simultaneously, are indicative of "greater emotional complexity and more adaptive functioning"10. These experiences, often described by terms like poignancy or ambivalence, are a direct result of how the brain constructs emotion.
The brain's ability to create novel emotional interpretations from past experiences is referred to as "generativity" or "conceptual combination"12. This means that the brain can construct a single emotional instance by combining features from multiple past emotion categories12. For example, a "happily surprised" expression combines muscle movements associated with both happiness and surprise, demonstrating that these compound emotions are both neurologically and physically distinct and universally recognizable13.
The neuroscience of emotional complexity shows that these states are orchestrated by a "symphony of neural networks," including the Default Mode Network and the Salience Network11. The dynamic interaction of the amygdala and prefrontal cortex is also crucial for regulating and blending emotions, influencing behavior and decision-making16. This understanding validates the CEF's operational model, which allows for a rich, multifaceted experience rather than a single, blended state.
The genius of the Core Emotion Framework lies in its ability to translate the complex theories of emotion into granular simple "mental operations" to which everybody can relate to in some way. These operations are not arbitrary but are a strategic synthesis of proven, evidence-based techniques from established fields of psychology and therapeutic practice.
The CEF’s initial operations for awareness and recognition are foundational, providing a direct connection to the body's internal signals. The practice of Somatic Experiencing (SE) provides a clear scientific basis for this approach. SE is a body-oriented therapeutic method that focuses on "bottom-up processing," which directs a client's attention to their "internal sensations, both visceral (interoception) and musculoskeletal (proprioception and kinaesthesis)"17. This mirrors the CEF's emphasis on body-oriented awareness as a prerequisite for effective emotional processing.
The framework's operations also align with well-known mindfulness practices. The RAIN method, an acronym for Recognize, Allow, Investigate, and Nurture, is a powerful mindfulness tool for practicing self-compassion18. The CEF's "Sensing" operation is directly mapped to the first step of RAIN, which encourages individuals to "recognize what is happening" internally and externally, and "Accepting" is to "allow the experience to be there, just as it is"19. This provides a direct, verifiable link between the CEF and a widely used practice for reducing stress, anxiety, and feelings of being overwhelmed18.
For the critical task of emotional regulation, the CEF draws on two distinct yet complementary pathways: the cognitive and the somatic.
The cognitive pathway is directly supported by the principles of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), a structured, goal-oriented talk therapy20. CBT helps individuals become aware of problematic thought patterns and core beliefs, teaching them to "challenge thinking patterns that may be creating issues" by asking whether their perceptions are "based on facts or just feelings"20. This principle underpins the CEF's operations that require conscious analysis and rational reframing, providing a powerful, evidence-based tool for managing emotions.
The somatic pathway leverages body-oriented techniques to regulate the nervous system. The research identifies specific somatic exercises—such as "Grounding Through the Feet," "Self-Holding," and "Diaphragmatic Breathing"22—that directly target the physiological manifestations of stress and anxiety, such as increased heart rate, shallow breathing, and muscle tension22. These exercises activate the parasympathetic nervous system, shifting the individual from a state of hyperarousal to one of calm and safety22.
Similarly, the CEF offers a set of exercises aligned with each Core Emotion—practices that teach the brain to interpret bodily noise and shift fluidly into emotional resonance. For example:
Calculating: Engage with puzzles and mathematics to activate structured cognition.
These exercises serve as embodied invitations—rituals that train the nervous system to recognize, regulate, and reroute emotional signals through movement and metaphor. Each one is a somatic rehearsal for emotional fluency.
A sophisticated application of the CEF's principles involves reframing psychological defense mechanisms. For example, "intellectualization," the act of using logic and reasoning to avoid uncomfortable emotions, is typically classified as a "neurotic defense mechanism"23. While it can be an unhealthy, long-term avoidance tactic, it can also serve as a "healthy coping strategy" for temporary use, such as when a medical professional must set aside grief to continue their shift23.
The CEF approach to this is similar to Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), which is built on the synthesis of two seemingly opposite strategies: acceptance and change25. This framework is more factual and direct because it prevents an individual from getting "stuck" in a single mode, such as intellectualizing emotions to avoid feeling them27. Like DBT's "Opposite Action" skill, which advises taking actions that are contrary to emotional urges to change an emotional state, the CEF recommends a deliberate and dynamic shift between its operations29. This ensures that the logical detachment of a cognitive operation like Calculating must be followed by a somatic operation like Sense or Accept to ensure a balanced and healthy process23.
This idea can be intuitively actionalyzed through the Mirroring Technique of the CEF, in which a person is invited to mirror themselves against a Public Banner or another accessible visual depiction of the Core Emotions. As the eye wanders across the images, the mind begins to attune—catching up instinctively with how to shift. The technique leverages visual resonance to prompt internal recalibration, allowing emotional transitions to unfold with minimal cognitive effort.
The final operations of the CEF, which concern expression and social connection, are also grounded in established practice. The fourth step of the RAIN method, "Nurture with self-compassion"18, provides a clear basis for the framework's focus on healthy, non-judgmental self-expression. By moving from recognition and investigation to self-nurturing, the individual learns to respond to their emotions with kindness and care19. This provides a professional and supportive foundation for emotional expression. Furthermore, the somatic exercises that release physical tension in the jaw and shoulders also serve to physically facilitate emotional release and expression22.
The Core Emotion Framework is not a competitor to existing emotional intelligence (EI) models but a crucial, complementary layer that fills a critical gap in the emotional development landscape. A comparative review of widely adopted frameworks demonstrates the CEF's unique and essential contribution.
Daniel Goleman's model, a foundational framework for emotional intelligence, is divided into four key domains: Self-Awareness, Self-Management, Social Awareness, and Relationship Management31. These domains are further broken down into specific competencies, such as emotional self-awareness, emotional self-control, and empathy32. This model is widely used in corporate and leadership development, highlighting the importance of EI for professional success32.
Similarly, the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL) framework is a prominent model in educational settings. The "CASEL 5" core competencies include Self-Awareness, Self-Management, Social Awareness, Relationship Skills, and Responsible Decision-Making33. The framework is grounded in research and provides a structure for teaching students the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary for social and emotional development33.
While the Goleman and CASEL models are invaluable for defining and categorizing emotional intelligence, they share a common limitation: they are taxonomies that describe what emotional competence looks like but do not provide a clear guide for how to develop it. This is the critical gap that the Core Emotion Framework is designed to fill.
The CEF’s ten mental operations function as an "operating manual" that operationalizes the high-level competencies of these existing frameworks. For example, Goleman’s model defines "emotional self-awareness" as the ability to recognize one’s emotions and their effects32. The CEF provides the actual process for achieving this: it begins not with abstract recognition, but with the activation of specific Core Emotions—such as Sensing, Calculating, or Deciding. Although they are somewhat similar to the Mental Operations like Recognize, Investigate, and Analyze, they are structurally distinct processes that invite the nervous system to interpret emotional signals through movement, metaphor, and ritual. Rather than making legacy concepts “actionable,” the CEF introduces a new architecture for emotional fluency—one that is embodied, and neurologically precise
The CEF's role as a practical implementation layer significantly enhances the utility of existing frameworks. It provides a shared lexicon and a clear, linear process for emotional development, which is often missing from high-level competency models.
The Public Banner Initiative is a strategic, evidence-based application of the Core Emotion Framework that leverages modern behavioral science to promote well-being at a population level. It is not merely a branding exercise but a well-conceived, high-impact intervention with a compelling business case.
The initiative is a prime example of "nudge theory," a concept rooted in decades of behavioral science35. A nudge is a form of "choice architecture" that influences behavior without compelling or coercing an individual36. It operates on the principle that humans are not always rational and that subtle environmental cues can guide their choices, often by appealing to gut-level decision-making35. The banners, by their physical presence and design, serve as these subtle cues. A key finding from the research is that effective nudges "conserve autonomy and patient choice" by "inviting, rather than compelling, individuals to display the behavior"36. This aligns perfectly with the CEF's mission to empower individuals, not dictate their actions. The banners provide a non-intrusive reminder of the framework's operations, allowing people to engage with the concepts at their own pace and in their own time.
The efficacy of the banners is directly tied to the psychology of visual communication. Research confirms that visual elements such as color, shape, and imagery have a profound impact on emotions. For example, cool colors like blue and green can evoke calmness and refreshment, while images of human faces, which are universally recognized, are highly effective at conveying emotion. The banners can be designed to evoke specific feelings and direct attention to the most critical content, thereby enhancing the emotional experience and interpretation of the message37.
Furthermore, the therapeutic power of visual aids is well-documented. Research in educational settings shows that visual supports "enhance understanding, support communication, facilitate memory and recall, and increase engagement, making learning more effective and less anxiety-inducing"39. This applies equally to adults in a workplace setting. By making emotional concepts visible and tangible, the banners provide a crucial cognitive scaffold that makes the CEF’s abstract mental operations more accessible and easier to remember.
The repeated, passive exposure to the banners creates a powerful behavioral loop. Research on staff well-being boards notes that a "vibrant well-being board is a daily reminder of the company's commitment to employee health"41. The banners serve as a "passive nudge" that reinforces new mental habits, such as focusing on mindfulness or self-care, overcoming the cognitive resistance that can accompany traditional, one-time learning programs42. By placing the banners in high-traffic communal areas like kitchens and restrooms, the initiative ensures that these visual cues are seen often, reinforcing their purpose through repetition42.
The Public Banner Initiative is a strategic investment with a compelling financial case. The research demonstrates a clear link between emotional intelligence and positive business outcomes, with emotionally intelligent leaders and teams improving performance, productivity, and collaboration43. A Harvard study and a meta-analysis of 42 studies found that for every dollar companies invest in wellness programs, they can save over $3 on medical costs and nearly $3 on absenteeism, representing a return of $6 for every $1 spent45.
While the banners are a low-cost component of a broader well-being strategy, they are a high-impact, high-ROI micro-intervention. By leveraging the principles of visual communication and nudge theory, they provide a powerful, continuous reinforcement of the CEF’s operations35. This reinforcement helps to drive the adoption of behaviors that lead to the documented business outcomes of reduced healthcare costs, lower absenteeism, and increased productivity45. The Public Banner Initiative is not merely an aesthetic choice; it is a financially sound investment in human capital.
Based on the preceding analysis, several strategic recommendations are proposed to enhance and extend the Core Emotion Framework and its Public Banner Initiative:
The Core Emotion Framework is not simply a new theory but a robust, scientifically-backed model that operationalizes the complex processes of emotion. It successfully bridges the gap between the theoretical taxonomies of established frameworks and the actionable, step-by-step guidance that individuals need for genuine emotional development. By synthesizing techniques from CBT, mindfulness, and somatic therapies, the CEF provides a comprehensive and coherent "operating manual" for emotional intelligence.
Furthermore, the Public Banner Initiative is a strategic and evidence-based application of this framework. It leverages the powerful, yet subtle, principles of nudge theory and visual communication to reinforce healthy emotional habits in a non-coercive way. As a high-impact, low-cost micro-intervention, the initiative is poised to deliver both a profound human impact by empowering individuals to take ownership of their emotional health and a measurable business return through enhanced well-being, productivity, and organizational culture. The CEF and its public banner initiative are not just about understanding emotion; they are about cultivating it for the benefit of both the individual and the organization.
The Psychology of Organization: How Optimized Storage Solutions Reduce Stress, accessed September 3, 2025, https://www.contempospace.com/blog/psychology-of-organization/
The Mental Health Benefits of Staying Organized - Northside Hospital EAP | Anthem, accessed September 3, 2025, https://www.anthemeap.com/northside-hospital/emotional-wellness/mental-health/articles/the-mental-health-benefits-of-staying-organized
Compound facial expressions of emotion - PNAS, accessed September 3, 2025, https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1322355111?app=true
Transform Emotions with Opposite Action DBT Skill Techniques - The Counseling Center Group, accessed September 3, 2025, https://counselingcentergroup.com/mastering-opposite-action-dbt/
Emotional intelligence, leadership, and work teams: A hybrid literature review - PMC, accessed September 3, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10543214/